Scoring Guidelines + Judges
Scoring Guidelines
Each nomination can achieve a maximum of 45 points as follows:
- Number and scope of new and current responsibilities and their importance to the business (6 points)
- Training initiative (20 points total):
Level of potential business impact (i.e., revenue generation, new product launch, change initiative, new technology launch): 0-3 points
Level of difficulty of challenges faced: 0-2 points
Project scope (companywide, individual functions, global vs. national, etc.): 0-3 points
Business unit goal the program aimed to help achieve: 0-2 points
Instructional design (learning objectives linked to business outcomes; level of leadership involved in design, development, and facilitation; reinforcement): 0-3 points
Innovation of the training: 0-3 points
Business outcomes achieved/expectations met: 0-4 points
- Leadership/business skills utilized (up to 1 point for quality of each example; plus 3 points for Level 3 and 4 results for each section for a total of 14 points)
- Readiness to lead the Training or Learning and Development function (2 points for timing; 3 points for reason(s); for a total of 5 points)
Judges
All nominations are judged by Training’s editor/publisher, Lorri Freifeld, the Training Hall of Famers (organizations that earned a Top 10 placement in the Training APEX Awards rankings for four consecutive years) and Training’s Editorial Advisory Board members:
Training Hall of Fame
- Birmingham Water Works Board
- BNSF Railway
- Booz Allen Hamilton
- Dollar General Corporation
- Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
- KLA Corporation
- KPMG LLP
- Leading Real Estate Companies of the World
- McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
- Medical Solutions
- Nationwide
- PwC
- Rosendin
- Sonic Automotive
- Verizon
Training Editorial Advisory Board Members:
- Brent Bloom, Consulting Service Solutions inc.
- Vincente Gonzalez, Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Bruce Jones, formerly of Disney Institute
- Ross Tartell, Columbia University
- Catherine Rickelman, formerly of IBM